«Non si può dire che il maggior protagonismo delle bambine (nel servizio all’altare) incrementi le vocazioni femminili alla vita consacrata: al contrario, l'esperienza insegna che dove si è diffusa questa pratica le vocazioni femminili sono calate ancor più della norma. In sostanza, anche solo per una ragione di prudenza o lungimiranza pastorale, direi che questa prassi è da scoraggiare». Così spiegava nel 2008 al Timone l’allora segretario della Congregazione per il culto divino e la disciplina dei sacramenti, Malcolm Ranjith, attuale cardinale e arcivescovo di Colombo in Sri Lanka.
Sull’inopportunità delle «chierichette»
si espresse in termini simili anche l’attuale arcivescovo di Parigi, il cardinale Vingt-Trois, quando era arcivescovo di Tours: «Quando arrivano le bambine, spariscono i bambini». Cioè le possibili, future vocazioni, visto che il servizio all’altare da piccoli resta una costante per la grande maggioranza dei sacerdoti.
Ma oltre alle dichiarazioni di intenti c’è chi sta prendendo iniziative concrete su una pratica liturgica introdotta in vari Paesi per realizzare una sorta di «pari opportunità» nell’ambito della Messa (e non di rado favorita come rimando implicito al diaconato e/o sacerdozio femminile, essendo la figura del ministrante in qualche modo un riflesso di quella sacerdotale).
Negli Stati Uniti le diocesi di Lincoln (Nebraska), Ann Harbor (Michigan) e Phoenix (Arizona) hanno fatto ufficialmente marcia indietro.
Un sacerdote americano, padre John Hollowell, ha dato conto sul suo blog di un mini sondaggio che si è divertito a realizzare contattando alcune parrocchie che hanno dismesso le «chierichette»: dopo un po’ di tempo in tutte queste comunità il numero di chierichetti, solo maschi, risultava di gran lunga maggiore rispetto a quando erano maschi e femmine insieme.
Father John Hollowell
There's been a lot of discussion on whether it is better to have male altar servers or to allow both girls and boys to serve at the altar.
Most of the discussion ends up being people offering their opinions
"I think it helps girls discern religious life"
"I think it fosters vocations to the priesthood"
"I think boys are more likely to serve if girls don't serve"
"I think boys are just as likely to serve whether or not girls are allowed to"
and the opinions continue to pass each other like missiles mid flight
I like statistics, so I solicited some. I'd love to have more, so if you know of a parish, drop their stats in as a comment, and I'll add them.
I asked for parishes that made the switch to all male altar servers what their server numbers were like before the switch and what the number of servers was about a year after the switch.
Here we go:
That's hard to argue with. The average parish surveyed, when switching from co-ed servers to male-only saw their server numbers grow 450%
As this has spread a bit across the internet, the statisticians have come out of the woodwork. I was a math major, and so let me say, first of all, that I understand that correlation does not imply causality. I had it beat into my brain in high school and college. Correlation does not imply causality, but it certainly can SUGGEST causality, and 450% change is certainly GIGANTIC change.
Secondly, some of the statistical hounds have pointed out that "the sample size is too small."
a) I never said this was scientific
b) one person has noted that I would need 200 parishes and another noted I would need at least 32 parishes. I agree it would be great to get more parishes, but I'm not sure 32 parishes in the USA have had co-ed servers and have since switched back to only male servers.
c) If you want a "statistically relevant" study, feel free to go conduct one yourself. I don't have time. My limited research has told me all I needed. If you want more, feel free to go get more. I'm busy pastoring a parish.
d) You may also want to ask yourself why you are attacking the above graphic - is it because you have a concern that every piece of data, even one not claiming to be "scientific" actually meat scientific standards...or do you struggle with the data presented because it upsets your personally held belief on the matter?
Thirdly, one commenter has put it beautifully - "I don't understand why one side in this thread is expected to justify and extend the data it provides while the other gets to trot out unverifiable claims about unsampled groups and their "feelings"."
- I couldn't agree more! People are falling into the exact pattern that I described in my original post, even in the face of the stats above.
Look through the comments on this thread, and all you see from the "other side" is people throwing out their own theories and beliefs. It is amazing how quickly we dismiss statistics when they upset our beliefs on a subject.
People are saying things like "Have you thought of following these young men and women through adulthood to see if there is correlation of their staying in the Church, or even having their children baptized in the Church. You may ask the parents, especially the mothers, whether they intend to stay in Church."
and "An interesting list, for sure. I'd be curious to see other statistics about those parishes, namely their population size, the number of children, and compare those fields to the before & after numbers. I'm also curious if there were any where the numbers dropped."
and "there is no qualitative data about how this affected young girls' feelings towards themselves or the Church."
and "maybe it is the lack of strong role models that cause boys not to want to altar serve. Maybe it is indeed that boys psychologically do not tolerate a mixed crowd when it comes to altar serving. Perhaps there are other reasons such as world view differences that lead to the actual cause being obscured."
and "I can't help but feel that at altar serving age, I would have felt very turned off by a switch such as this. I am curious to know what the females in this age group at these parishes feel about not being allowed to serve."
Here's my response - heck, it could be that each of these parishes had interstellar star dust sprinkled on them by aliens and that is why the numbers grew. I don't know the cause, and people can throw out their theories all day long.
I would also to say to such comments: feel FREE to go and study these theories with research of your own. I will not be doing any such research, but would love to hear about it if you research your personal theories as to why the numbers are what they are.
I'll end where I began - Every parish that I've heard from who switched from co-ed servers to all male servers saw, one year after the switch, an average increase of FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY PERCENT! That's pretty incredible.